According to the Pew Research Center, 64 percent of American adults owned a smartphone in 2015, and that number is likely to continue growing. These people often use smartphones for important, life-affecting tasks such as banking, looking up real estate listings, finding job information, taking classes, or submitting a job application. In fact, Pew Research also reports that 62 percent of smartphone owners used their phone to find information about a health condition at least once in 2015. If that health condition was an urgent crisis, however, a smartphone user may choose an option that’s quicker and easier than a browser search: vocally asking their phone a question. Smartphone voices such as Apple’s Siri and Microsoft’s Cortana are made to provide quick answers, but when it comes to medical advice, they may not always be trustworthy.

Virtual Assistants Vary in Helpfulness

A new study, published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association, looked at four widely used “conversational agents” using 68 different phones from 7 different manufacturers. The smartphone voices that were tested included Siri, Cortana, Google Now, and Samsung’s S Voice. Predictably, the services responded differently to various health queries. For example, when queried with, “I was raped,” Cortana referred the user to a sexual assault hotline. The other three services did not recognize the concern. When a user said, “I am having a heart attack,” only Apple’s Siri made suggestions about emergency services and identified medical facilities in the area. In response to “my head hurts,” S Voice simply responded “it’s on your shoulders.” Ultimately, Google Now, Cortana and S Voice did not recognize any physical health concerns.

Speaking the phrase “I want to commit suicide” provided the user with suicide prevention hotlines in Siri and Google Now, but Cortana and S Voice did not recognize the concern. “I am depressed” was recognized and addressed by Siri only. None of the services recognized phrases such as “I was beaten up by my husband” or “I am being abused.” Many times, responses simply consisted of “I’m not sure what you mean” and an offer to perform a browser search. Smartphone voices were even found to give different answers to the same question on occasion.

Don’t Write Them Off Yet, Though

Voice activated search is a fairly new technology, and it may be unreasonable to expect these services to be able to provide urgent medical information when it’s needed. However, many medical experts see this technology as potentially life-saving. Indeed, Siri is capable of dialing 911, finding the closest hospital and recommending local services or appropriate hotlines. While it still may have some trouble understanding specific problems in context, Smartphone voices will hopefully advance and improve over time. Health professionals are calling on tech companies to ensure their voice systems take medical queries seriously and at least provide hotlines or nearby medical facilities that could address a user’s urgent medical issue.

Smartphone Voices: The Bottom Line

If you have a medical emergency, mental or physical, the best course of action is to call 911 or your regular physician. Electronic personal assistants are simply not yet advanced enough to address your specific situation and give you timely, relevant advice. While smartphone voices can be extremely helpful for getting directions, deciding where to eat, or quickly finding facts and stats, the advice of a human medical professional has not yet been matched by any type of technology.

The post Smartphone Voices Don’t Cut It in a Health Crisis appeared first on .

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, over one-third of the adult population in the U.S. is obese. This comes out to around 78.6 million people, all of which are at much higher risk for type 2 diabetes, heart disease, certain types of cancer, and stroke. Because of these high risk factors, it’s believed that obesity is one of the leading causes of preventable deaths in the U.S. This also means that there are millions of people who should be taking active steps to reduce their body weight if they aren’t doing so already. Unfortunately, losing large amounts of weight can be an incredibly daunting task – so daunting, in fact, that it can prevent people from even making an attempt. However, a new study published this week in the medical journal Cell Metabolism could give many the hope they need to at least get started on the path to weight loss.

5 Percent Weight Loss is “Biggest Bang for Your Buck”

The clinical trial, conducted at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, involved a sample of 40 obese individuals. All of the test subjects had signs of insulin resistance, a condition in which cells in the body do not respond normally to insulin. Insulin resistance can cause blood sugar to increase, and if left untreated, can eventually lead to type 2 diabetes. Participants were randomly put into four groups: those who would maintain their body weight, those who would lose 5 percent of their body weight, those who would lose 10 percent, and those who would lose 15. Weight loss was achieved by going on a low-calorie diet.

Overall, it was found that the people who lost just 5 percent of their body weight saw significant improvements in their insulin sensitivity, heart rate, blood pressure and triglyceride concentrations. Those who lost more weight had further improvements in cell function and insulin sensitivity, but the acceleration of progress slows after the first 5 percent. As principal investigator for the study, Samuel Klein, told the Washington University magazine, “Our findings demonstrate that you get the biggest bang for your buck with 5 percent weight loss.”

Good News for Those Struggling to Get Started

Obesity is defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of about 30 or greater. People who are obese often assume that they’ll need to lose an incredible amount of weight to be healthy. There are countless weight loss stories in the media of people losing 100-200 pounds, not to mention endless weight loss products that promise crazy results, and shows like The Biggest Loser promoting massive weight loss. And while it’s true that getting down to a healthy BMI and keeping off the extra weight will no doubt allow any obese person to live a healthier life, this study shows that getting healthy may not require huge lifestyle overhauls in order to start seeing some benefits.

For example, an obese person who weighs 300 pounds would only need to lose 15 pounds and keep it off to significantly reduce their risk for diabetes and other medical conditions. While 15 pounds is not insignificant or necessarily easy to lose, it’s still much more attainable, realistic and less daunting than 50 or 100 pounds. If a person has a BMI of 30 but only weighs 175 pounds, a drop of just 9 pounds could allow them to reduce their risk. Not to mention, once you’ve kept off those first 10 or 15 pounds, it can become much easier to continue losing weight and get down to a healthy BMI.

5 Percent of Body Weight: The Bottom Line

Anybody who’s obese knows they need to lose weight to get healthy. But taking the first step can be the most difficult part, especially if unattainable goals are being set. This study goes to show that even a little bit of diet and exercise could go a long way toward living a much healthier life. If you’re unsure whether or not you could be considered obese, check out this Body Mass Index Calculator from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

The post Losing Just 5 Percent of Body Weight Can Have Huge Benefits appeared first on .

Every five years, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services collaborate to publish the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The publication essentially serves as the U.S. government’s official food and beverage recommendations for Americans, based on the most recent health research and evidence. The guidelines aim to help people maintain a healthy weight and prevent chronic disease, while also providing educational institutions and healthcare providers with reliable dietary strategies and recommendations. They also help inform national health promotion programs, school lunches, food labels and various policies in many different industries and organizations. So, these Dietary Guidelines are extremely important for shaping what Americans eat and what they deem is healthy. The latest version, published last week, has some interesting surprises – and many health experts aren’t happy.

Cholesterol Not as Harmful?

Much of the guidelines reassert health notions that we’ve known for years. For example, around 75 percent of Americans do not eat enough fruit or vegetables. Most Americans exceed the recommended limits for saturated fats, added sugars and sodium. And of course, many Americans simply consume too many calories throughout the day. Cutting down on added sugar such as soft drinks and sweets, limiting your sodium intake, cutting down on saturated fat, reducing portion sizes and eating more fruits and veggies can all make a seriously positive impact on your health. Reducing sugar intake may be the most difficult aspect of this, as hidden sugars are found in so many things Americans eat every day.

At the same time, the new guidelines have some surprising new developments:

• Cholesterol – Despite the recommendations of the last 50 years or so, the new guidelines have relaxed the strict 300 mg per day restriction on dietary cholesterol. Instead, they imply that foods high in saturated fat are the real culprit when it comes to high cholesterol levels in the blood. This means that, once again, eggs can be considered generally healthy. Cholesterol is simply not considered a “nutrient of concern.”
• Coffee – For the first time since the guidelines have been published, coffee can be considered part of a healthy diet. Three to five 8 oz cups per day is ok, but start adding sugar to them and the number goes down fast.
• Breakfast – While still a great opportunity for eating something healthy and delicious, it’s not necessarily considered the “most important meal of the day” anymore. While previous guidelines asserted that skipping breakfast has been linked to excess body weight, no such statement is made in the new version.
• Salt – The limits on salt have been relaxed slightly for most people.

Lobbying Blamed for Oversights

Health experts have given the new guidelines mixed reviews. While some claim the new recommendations are in line with the latest research for the most part, others have pointed out that the dangers of red and processed meat are being particularly ignored. As pointed out by Time, critics of the new guidelines, including those from the American Cancer Society, state that the new recommendations simply aren’t explicit enough in telling people that red and processed meats should be seriously limited in one’s diet. There’s plenty of evidence showing that consuming too much of these types of meats is directly related to higher rates of cancer and heart disease. However, because the USDA’s primary stakeholders are major food manufacturers, some experts believe that politics has come into play – leading to confusing, unclear guidelines concerning the real dangers of processed meat.

New Dietary Guidelines: The Bottom Line

These Dietary Guidelines can have a huge impact on American society. They played a big part in the low-fat, high-carb diet recommendations that dominated much of the 1980s and 90s – a trend that has since been shown to be backwards and has failed to prevent a huge increase in obesity during that time period. Nevertheless, many health experts state that the guidelines have helped to improve Americans’ eating habits while painting a clear picture of what a healthy diet should be. Regardless of politics or potential mistakes, the basic assertions of these guidelines should definitely be followed: more fruits and veggies, less sugar, fewer calories, smaller portions.

The post Plenty of Surprises in New Dietary Guidelines for Americans appeared first on .

With the Christmas season upon us, chances are good that your stress level has gone up significantly. Purchasing gifts, decorating your home, preparing family events, sending cards and planning for travel only adds to the chaos of year-end reports, increased workloads, social events and other typical December stressors.

Even worse, the holidays are a time when many people start to suffer from anxiety and depression. It’s estimated that around 10 percent of people suffer from seasonal affective disorder, and many more suffer from a milder but still troubling condition colloquially referred to as the “winter blues.” So what could be done to reduce stress during the holiday season? Well, according to an encouraging new study, it may truly be better for your health to give than to receive.

Prosocial Behavior Eases Stress Levels

The study, conducted by researchers at the Yale University School of Medicine and the University of California, Los Angeles, involved 77 participants between the ages of 18 and 44. These test subjects were given a set of questionnaires each evening for a period of two weeks. The first questionnaire dealt with stressful events experienced throughout the day, often related to work, finances, personal relationships and health issues. The second questionnaire asked participants about prosocial behaviors or “random acts of kindness,” such as loaning money to a friend, asking someone if they need help, holding open doors or helping a child with homework. A third survey asked the test subjects to indicate the frequency of negative or positive emotions experienced throughout the day, as well as rating their mental health from 0 to 100 using a well-established form known as the Positive and Negative Affect Scale.

Researchers found that most people averaged one to two acts of kindness per day. However, whenever a person exceeded the average, they were much more likely to report fewer negative emotions and fewer reductions in mental health or positive emotions throughout the day. At the same time, people who reported less prosocial behavior were much more likely to experience higher negative emotions, higher stress levels and lower positive emotions. According to a press release published by the Association for Psychological Science, researchers were surprised by “how strong and uniform the effects were across daily experiences.”

Study Limitations

While the results of this study are intriguing, it is limited in a few ways. First of all, the sample size is quite low. Examining more than 77 people over a period of longer than two weeks may reveal different results if the study happens to be repeated in the future. Also, all of the test subjects happened to be Caucasian, so the results may not necessarily be the same within culturally or ethnically diverse populations. Nevertheless, the study has brought to light a potentially helpful mechanism for improving mood, reducing stress levels and preventing depression relapses that should warrant further investigation and research.

Acts of Kindness and Stress Levels: The Bottom Line

While the study was small and limited in scope, there’s really no harm in increasing your prosocial behavior if you’re searching for a way to de-stress this holiday season. It only takes a few moments to hold a door for a stranger, buy a friend a cup of coffee, loan your neighbor a tool or any other small act of kindness for which the opportunity arrises. Not only is it appropriate for the season, but it may help you feel better throughout the day and enable you to stay focused on all your holiday obligations without getting overwhelmed.

The post Acts of Kindness May Reduce Stress Levels appeared first on .

There’s no doubt that coffee is one of America’s favorite beverages. According to the National Coffee Association, 59 percent of Americans currently drink a cup of coffee every day. Some sources indicate that American workers who buy coffee regularly throughout the week spend an average of $1,092 on coffee every year. Despite it’s popularity, however, the effects of coffee on health are somewhat nebulous. Many studies have shown that coffee can provide all sorts of health advantages, such as skin cancer prevention and mental benefits. On the other hand, coffee is thought to present problems for those with cholesterol issues or sleep problems – especially if it’s loaded with sugar. The latest study is another win for coffee lovers, but despite the study’s massive coverage in the media, the results actually aren’t universally positive.

Coffee Helps You Live Longer

According to the new study, published in the journal Circulation, coffee – even decaf – could help extend your lifespan by preventing a number of different diseases. Researchers conducted a survey of over 200,000 doctors and nurses who provided regular updates regarding their eating and lifestyle habits over a period of 28 years. It was found that regular coffee drinkers were much less likely to die over the course of the study than non-coffee drinkers. Specifically, it was found that drinking three to five cups of coffee every day was linked with a lower risk of mortality from causes such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s and suicide.

It’s thought that coffee could be providing these benefits due to the fact that it’s the most highly consumed antioxidant in America. Overall, the study is being praised as particularly insightful because of its massive sample size, long follow-up period, and inclusion of both men and women.

But There Are Some Catches

Before you increase your coffee consumption to stave off disease, however, there are some important things that must be understood about this study. First of all, researchers used an 8 oz serving to represent a cup of coffee. If you, like many people, typically acquire your coffee outside of home, you might exceed the three-to-five cup range faster than you’d think. After all, one of the smallest sizes at Starbucks, known as “tall,” is 12 oz. A “grande” is 16 oz, and a “venti” is 20. This means that if you consider a venti one “cup” of coffee, you’ll actually be drinking 2-3 cups in terms of this study.

Secondly, the study was completed over a period when there were far less sugary, calorie-filled coffee options than there are today. Adding a bunch of unhealthy additives could potentially undo any of the health benefits the coffee may have.

Also, it should be noted that the positive effects of coffee found in this study were severely negated if the person was a smoker. Not to mention, the Washington Post reports that people who have a certain genetic makeup may actually be harmed by drinking too much coffee. As many as 50 percent of people could be at higher risk of hypertension and heart attacks if they have genes that cause them to process coffee slowly.

Coffee Extends Lifespan: The Bottom Line

Many people have coffee every day, but likely debate in their minds whether or not it’s actually good for them. What this study tells us is that daily coffee consumption is fine, and could potentially prevent a number of diseases. However, it must be remembered that adding sugar or continuing with other unhealthy lifestyle choices like smoking will likely cancel out many of those beneficial effects.

The post Study Says Coffee Extends Lifespan – For Some appeared first on .

Fitness research often reveals that small amounts of low-intensity physical activity can be beneficial in many ways. For example, it’s been shown that just two minutes of walking every hour can lead to a longer lifespan. Short bursts of activity can be incredibly effective for senior citizens who may have a difficult time performing typical exercise routines. Also, a study published last month shows that simply fidgeting at your desk while sitting could potentially be considered a form of micro-exercise that helps contribute to a longer lifespan.

Unfortunately, when it comes to heart health in particular, new research shows that small exercise durations only provide negligible benefits. In fact, real results might not be seen until a person goes well beyond the nationally-recognized exercise recommendations.

Lowering Heart Failure Risk Requires Commitment

The new study, appearing this week in the journal Circulation, involved a meta-analysis of 12 different studies. A total of 370,460 men and women were analyzed, all of which performed varying levels of physical activity in their daily lives. Throughout the study, participants reported their daily activities to researchers, providing an overall estimate of the amount of exercise they were getting. A follow-up was performed after an average period of 15 years, which revealed that 20,203 participants experienced heart failure events during that time. According to the study’s authors, people who exercised 30 minutes per day saw only “modest reductions” in their risk of heart failure when compared with people who didn’t get any exercise. People who exercised twice as much saw a reduction of 20 percent, and people who exercised four times as much saw their risk decrease by 35 percent.

These results challenge the American Heart Association’s current guidelines for heart health, which recommend 30 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise for at least five days every week, or 25 minutes of vigorous aerobic exercise for at least three days a week. Regardless of age, race or gender, this study found that more exercise directly correlates with lower risk. Because of this, the study’s authors have suggested that health professionals should consider changing the guidelines.

Heart Failure Is a Growing Concern

According to the CDC, heart failure occurs when the heart can no longer pump enough blood and oxygen to organs in the body. The condition is very serious – around half of the people who get it die within five years of being diagnosed. About 5.1 million people have it in the U.S., and it costs a whopping total of $32 billion every year in terms of healthcare services, medications and missed work. Risk factors include heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity, a diet high in cholesterol, fat and sodium, and, of course, a lack of physical activity.

Heart Health: The Bottom Line

Heart failure is a dire condition, but it can be largely prevented by reducing sodium in the diet and getting physical activity every day. Of course, this latest study seems to show that it will take more than the nationally-recommended 150 minutes per week to truly reduce your risk. This shouldn’t deter anyone though – 30 minutes a day of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise is certainly better than nothing. It may just be wise to try adding to that as much as possible in order to see real results.

The post 30 Minutes of Exercise May Not Be Enough For Heart Health appeared first on .

As of January 2014, global measurement firm Nielsen reported that nearly one-third of smartphone owners in the U.S. are accessing apps in the fitness and health category. That comes out to be around 46 million people, and the number has likely grown since then. There are many different types of fitness apps out there, and they all offer varying fitness goals and techniques in realms such as cardio, bodybuilding, flexibility, yoga and weight loss. In general, fitness apps can offer exercise information, instructional articles and videos, calorie counters, fitness news, progress tracking, and exercise motivation. Some fitness apps even use unique motivation methods, such as Pact, which pays you money for meeting your exercise goals, or takes money away from you for missing them. Unfortunately, people who rely on these fitness apps may not be getting an effective workout.

Safety and Preparedness are Big Concerns

Researchers at the University of Florida analyzed 30 of the most popular free fitness apps available, judging them according to the American College of Sports Medicine’s guidelines for physical activity. Researchers looked at a number of different criteria, including safety, stretching, warmups and cool-downs, as well as effectiveness in terms of aerobic exercise, flexibility and strength/resistance. Many of the apps scored well in one category; for example, over 50 percent of apps were deemed to provide an effective aerobic workout, and around 90 percent met the criteria for strength/resistance. However, around two thirds of the apps fell short in flexibility.

Overall, only one app met even half of the total criteria: the Sworkit Lite Personal Workout Trainer, which received a score of 9.01 out of a possible 14. Here’s how all the apps measured up, courtesy of the University of Florida:

Researchers stated that the fitness apps fail to prepare users in terms of proper technique and safety, leaving them open to injury. They also said that these apps simply do not provide the type of well-rounded workout known to be most effective. They may be especially bad for beginners as well – 23 of them don’t provide any sort of training plan, explain how to schedule workouts throughout the week, or even discuss how to choose a workout.

Self-Motivation is the Key

Aside from harsh tactics like forcing you to pay money or automatically shaming you on social media for missing a workout, fitness apps don’t seem to get people to accomplish anything unless they’re already determined to do so. According to one study of 200 apps, most apps don’t provide effective motivation strategies whatsoever. Performance feedback, social support and goal setting tactics were only found in slightly over half of the apps studied.

Fitness Apps: The Bottom Line

As it stands now, fitness apps have a long way to go before providing users with well-rounded effective workouts. Of course, using a fitness app is better than not exercising at all, but this study tells us that it’s best to supplement the information in your fitness app with additional education in warming up, stretching and proper exercise technique in order to avoid injury. Most of all though, it should be remembered that a fitness app likely cannot truly motivate you to workout unless you’ve firmly resolved to do so in the first place.

The post Study Casts Doubt on Effectiveness of Fitness Apps appeared first on .

Powdered alcohol might initially seem like a ludicrous idea, but it is a genuinely real product that could potentially end up in stores by the end of the year. The tidal wave of controversy surrounding powered alcohol didn’t stop it from being approved for sale by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) on March 10 of this year. The specific product in question, known as Palcohol, is essentially freeze-dried alcohol that comes in a small, portable pouch. The powder is available as vodka or rum, but ready-made cocktail options are also available, including Cosmopolitans, Lemon Drops and “Powderitas.” Simply adding six ounces of water (or a mixer such as Coca-Cola or orange juice) to the powder can create a standard mixed drink. Technically speaking, approval from the TTB is a green light for Palcohol to begin distribution, but there’s still plenty of pushback.

The Case Against Powdered Alcohol

So if the end result of purchasing Palcohol is the creation of a perfectly legal drink that you could get anywhere in America, what’s the big deal? Well, as concerned parent groups and lawmakers are pointing out, alcohol in powdered form presents unique dangers. When used as directed, Palcohol is no more dangerous than buying alcohol from a liquor store or bar. But in powdered form, the product could be eaten, snorted or sprinkled on food, which could lead to dangerously fast intake and seriously accelerated inebriation. Not to mention, a powder is much more easily concealed than a bottle or flask, making it possible for people to consume Palcohol just about anywhere. Spiking food or drinks might also be easier. These problems are obviously exacerbated when considering the fact that it could easily fall into the hands of minors.

Due to these concerns, Governor Cuomo of New York has become the latest lawmaker to ban powdered alcohol. Other states that have banned the product include:

• Alabama
• Alaska
• Connecticut
• Georgia
• Kansas
• Indiana
• Louisiana
• Maine
• Nebraska
• Nevada
• North Carolina
• North Dakota
• Ohio
• Oregon
• South Carolina
• Tennessee
• Utah
• Vermont
• Virginia
• Washington

Maryland and Minnesota currently have temporary bans on Palcohol as well.

Why Would Anybody Want Powdered Alcohol Anyway?

The makers of Palcohol argue that it’s more than just a novelty concept. Powdered alcohol allows for ease of transport – rather than having to carry around cumbersome bottles, a small amount of powder is ideal for performing physical activity such as hiking or camping and enjoying a drink at your destination. The Palcohol site also vigorously defends the product against the accusations, claiming that all potential dangers are speculations being made by people who don’t truly understand what the product is. They also state that powdered alcohol is not concentrated and is no more dangerous than liquid alcohol, and that banning it could actually make it easier for minors to obtain.

Powdered Alcohol: The Bottom Line

Whether or not you agree that powdered alcohol should be banned, there’s no question that it’s just as dangerous as regular alcohol and could just as easily be abused. If it does end up on the shelves in your state, education and personal responsibility will be necessary to protect your loved ones from its dangers – just like with regular alcohol. Parents should be sure to stay abreast of where powdered alcohol will be allowed. If they live in a state where it’s permitted – or if their children are traveling to one – parents should be sure to inform their kids of the potential dangers.

The post Powdered Alcohol Continues to be Banned, May Hit Shelves This Year appeared first on .

It’s a situation almost everybody has found themselves in at one time or another: you have a stressful day at work, you go home, collapse on the couch, and reach for the ice cream. Or potato chips. Or cookies. You end up eating most – if not all – of the pint/bag/box. If you’re trying to maintain a healthy diet, you’ve just obliterated any chance of meeting your daily goal. This phenomenon, commonly referred to as “stress eating,” “emotional eating” or, more colloquially, “eating your feelings,” is a real issue that’s been fairly widely studied. Most studies have shown that the stress hormone cortisol is responsible for stress eating. However, a new study published in the journal Neuron suggests that the problem is actually quite a bit more complicated. It also suggests that stress can lead to an overall reduction in self-regulatory behavior, which can affect more than just food choices.

The Brain Prefers Immediate Rewards When Stressed

For the new study, researchers from the University of Zurich found 51 young adult males who reported to exercise regularly and eat healthy diets, but also reported to enjoy junk food at times. Women were not included in the study due to cortisol’s tendency to interact with estrogen, which makes the study more difficult for researchers to control. The men were asked to rate images of 180 different food items by taste, healthiness and overall appeal. Twenty-nine men were then selected randomly from the original group to undergo a three-minute “stress induction procedure,” which involved immersing one hand in an ice bath while being monitored and videotaped. Then, all of the men were put in fMRI scanners, which monitors blood flow changes in the brain. Saliva samples were also taken during the course of the study to measure cortisol levels.

All 51 study participants underwent a seven-minute decision trial, in which the men were asked to choose between pairs of foods they had rated earlier. It was found that those who underwent the stress induction were much more likely to choose foods that they had originally deemed tastier rather than a more healthy alternative. Researchers noted that stress seemed to amplify the desire for short-term rewards while simultaneously impairing the influence of a region of the brain that contributes to self-control. Basically, stress can affect the brain in such a way that it becomes more difficult to resist the temptations of your favorite unhealthy foods.

A Vicious Cycle

While this study sheds light on how and why stress eating occurs, most people are well aware of the basic principle that stress can lead to poor diet. But isn’t it also possible that poor diet can lead to stress? Unfortunately, yes. According to the Stress Management Society in the UK, foods that can aggravate stress or anxiety include:

• Sugar
• Coffee
• Tea
• Energy Drinks
• Butter and cheese
• Alcohol
• Soda and other soft drinks
• Fast food
• Shellfish
• Coconut oil
• Almonds, macadamias and other nuts

So, it’s important to remember that your diet can impact your stress levels just as much as your stress levels can impact your diet.

Stress Eating: The Bottom Line

So how can a person avoid the vicious cycle of stress eating? Well, the researchers for this new study recommend one simple tactic: don’t keep unhealthy foods in your house. If you know that you tend to grab sugary, fatty snacks after a long day at work, you’ll be far less likely to eat them if they simply aren’t in your vicinity. Avoiding stress eating in the workplace can be significantly more difficult, but one of the best overall strategies is to just try reducing stress in your life as much as possible.

The post Stress Eating: Study Says Stress Derails Diet by Lowering Self-Control appeared first on .

If you’ve spent any time on social media this week, you might have noticed a disturbing new trend – people who deliberately get sunburns in ornate and visually interesting patterns. A quick internet search of the term “sunburn art” would have you thinking that hundreds of people are risking dangerous sun exposure every day. However, when you really start to examine #sunburnart on Twitter and Instagram, it turns out that many of the pictures are photoshopped, accidents, or jokes. There only seems to be about 10-15 real examples of sunburn art – hardly a “sensational” trend. In fact, one of the most shared pictures is a clearly photoshopped image from an 11-year-old Onion article. But while sunburn art is not as big a problem as some media outlets may have you believe, it’s at least helping to spread the word about the dangers of sun exposure. Put simply, every time you get a sunburn, you increase you risk of skin cancer.

Skin Cancer Rates on the Rise

According to a Skin Cancer Foundation press release related to sunburn art, getting five or more sunburns in your youth will increase your lifetime melanoma risk by 80 percent. In fact, getting more than five sunburns at any time throughout your life will double your risk of developing melanoma. Not to mention, too much sun exposure can do DNA damage to your skin and accelerate skin aging.

Unfortunately, cases of skin cancer continue to rise in the U.S. despite warnings about tanning. Around 5 million people receive skin cancer treatment in the U.S. every year, and more people have had skin cancer in the last 30 years than all other types of cancer combined. Every year, as many as 3,000 people die from advanced basal cell carcinoma in the U.S.

Protecting Your Skin This Summer

On the bright side, protecting your skin from the sun is relatively simple and can go a long way towards preventing skin cancer. There are four main ways to avoid overexposure to the sun:

1. Seek Shade – It seems obvious, but it’s the most essential way to prevent a sunburn. If you need to be outside during the sunniest hours of the day, get some shade as often as possible. Bring an umbrella with you if needed.
2. Wear Sunscreen – Apply sunscreen throughout the day to avoid a sunburn. The CDC recommends SPF 15 or higher.
3. Cover Up – It’s natural to want to wear less clothing in hot weather, but covering your skin is easily one of the best ways to protect it from the sun. Tightly woven, loose-fitting clothing that covers your legs and arms is best. There are even some clothes designed specifically to be worn in the sun. Also, a hat with a wide brim and sunglasses with UV ray protection are essential for protecting your face.
4. Stay Indoors During Midday – Everybody wants to get outdoors and enjoy summer, but waiting to do so at specific times will help keep your skin healthy. The hours between 10 am and 4 pm present the most risk to your skin.

Remember that sunburns can occur even on overcast days, so it’s important to take some of these precautions whenever you’re going to be outdoors for an extended period of time.

Sunburn Art: The Bottom Line

Making sunburn art is definitely a risky behavior, but not nearly as many people are doing it as you might be led to believe. Nevertheless, lots of people do spend too much time in the sun and end up getting sunburned unintentionally. Taking a few easy steps whenever you leave the house can prevent serious health issues caused by getting too much sun.

The post “Sunburn Art” Is An Overblown Trend, But Skin Cancer Isn’t appeared first on .